Different Effect Sizes of Motor Skill Training Combined with Repetitive Transcranial versus Trans-Spinal Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects

GND
115868283
ORCID
0000-0003-0036-4368
Zugehörigkeit
Section of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital
Hamzei, Farsin;
GND
1128922185
ORCID
0000-0001-8190-5175
Zugehörigkeit
Section of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital
Ritter, Alexander;
GND
1330851978
Zugehörigkeit
Section of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital
Pohl, Kristin;
Zugehörigkeit
Department of Neurology, Moritz Klinik, Hermann-Sachse-Straße 46, 07639 Bad Klosterlausnitz, Germany;
Stäps, Peggy;
GND
1330852206
Zugehörigkeit
Section of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hans-Berger-Hospital of Neurology, Jena University Hospital
Wieduwild, Eric

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to enhance motor training (MT) performance. The use of rTMS is limited under certain conditions, such as after a stroke with severe damage to the corticospinal tract. This raises the question as to whether repetitive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (rSMS) can also be used to improve MT. A direct comparison of the effect size between rTMS and rSMS on the same MT is still lacking. Before conducting the study in patients, we determined the effect sizes of different stimulation approaches combined with the same motor training in healthy subjects. Two experiments (E1 and E2) with 96 subjects investigated the effect size of combining magnetic stimulation with the same MT. In E1, high-frequency rTMS, rSMS, and spinal sham stimulation (sham-spinal) were applied once in combination with MT, while one group only received the same MT (without stimulation). In E2, rTMS, rSMS, and sham-spinal were applied in combination with MT over several days. In all subjects, motor tests and motor-evoked potentials were evaluated before and after the intervention period. rTMS had the greatest effect on MT, followed by rSMS and then sham-spinal. Daily stimulation resulted in additional training gains. This study suggests that rSMS increases excitability and also enhances MT performance. This current study provides a basis for further research to discover whether patients who cannot be treated effectively with rTMS would benefit from rSMS.

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Rechte

Rechteinhaber: © 2024 by the authors.

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung: