Expert opinion—management of chronic myeloid leukemia after resistance to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

GND
1107039339
Zugehörigkeit
Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
Hochhaus, Andreas;
Zugehörigkeit
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Breccia, Massimo;
Zugehörigkeit
University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Saglio, Giuseppe;
Zugehörigkeit
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
García-Gutiérrez, Valentín;
Zugehörigkeit
Hôpital St. Louis, Paris, France
Réa, Delphine;
Zugehörigkeit
Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, loc. VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Janssen, Jeroen;
Zugehörigkeit
Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
Apperley, Jane

Regardless of line of therapy, treatment goals in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are: avoid progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis CML such that patients achieve a life expectancy comparable with that of the general population; avoid adverse events (AEs); and restore and maintain quality of life. The most important prognostic factor for achieving these goals is response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at key milestones. For patients failing a TKI, a treatment change is mandatory to limit the risk of progression and death. There is currently no precise guideline for patients that fail a second-generation TKI, and there is a paucity of data to guide clinical decision making in this setting. There is, therefore, an unmet need for practical and actionable guidance on how to manage patients who fail a second-generation TKI. Although the term ‘failure’ includes patients failing for resistance or intolerance, the focus of this paper is failure of a second-generation TKI because of resistance. CML patients who fail their first second-generation TKI for true resistance need a more potent therapy. In these patients, the key issues to consider are the relative appropriateness of early allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or the use of a further TKI. Selection of the next line of treatment after second-generation TKI resistance should be individualized and must be based on patient-specific factors including cytogenetics, mutation profile, comorbidities, age, previous history of AEs with prior TKI therapy, and risk profile for AEs on specific TKIs. This expert opinion paper is not in conflict with existing recommendations, but instead represents an evolution of previous notions, based on new data, insights, and clinical experience. We review the treatment options for patients resistant to second-generation TKI therapy and provide our clinical opinions and guidance on key considerations for treatment decision making.

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Rechte

Rechteinhaber: © The Author(s) 2020

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung: